Search:  
Username: Password:

About Us DAP Mandate

Established through the Health Professions Act: Bylaws of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Part 5 Section B., the Diagnostic Accreditation Program fuflills its mandate of promoting excellence in diagnostic health care by: 

  • Establishing performance standards that are consistent with professional knowledge to ensure the delivery of safe, high quality diagnostic service;
  • Evaluating a diagnostic service’s level of actual performance to achieving the performance standards;
  • Establishing a comparative database of health care organizations, and their performance to selected structure, process, and outcome standards or criteria;
  • Monitoring the performance of organizations through the establishment of proficiency testing programs and other robust quality indicators of performance;
  • Providing education and consultation to health care organizations, managers, and health professionals on quality improvement strategies and "best practices" in diagnostic health care;
  • Ensuring information learned from accreditation processes is used for system wide improvement;
  • Reporting to government, stakeholders and the public the performance of the diagnostic health care system as assessed through accreditation;
  • Strengthening the public's confidence in the quality of diagnostic health care;
  • Assisting organizations to reduce risks and increase safety for patients and staff;
  • Assisting organizations to reduce health care costs by promoting quality practices that increase efficiency and effectiveness of services; and
  • Serving and safeguarding the public

Services and Core Functions:

 

The DAP services are designed and delivered to capture the benefits of peer review, knowledge sharing and professional support. The DAP operates on a continuous quality improvement model rather than an inspectorial and strict enforcement of compliance basis, and remains highly committed to supportive, peer-based approaches to accreditation that foster the development of CQI cultures within the diagnostic services.

 

Core Functions 

  • Establishing accreditation programs targeted at specific health care services:
    • Establishing optimal achievement goals, standards, criteria and requirements
  •  Establishing programs for surveyor training and development:
    • Selecting skilled and appropriate surveyors
    • Providing orientation and training to surveyors
    • Evaluating and developing surveyor performance
    • Ensuring consistency of surveyors 
  • Establishing processes of accreditation:
    • Survey management - survey planning and self assessment
    • Setting the basis and criteria for awarding levels of accreditation
    • Timely determination of accreditation decisions
    • Establishing the duration and maintenance of accreditation
    • Establishing a process for appeal of accreditation decision
    • Reporting accreditation status of organizations to the public 
  • Establishing research and development, and education programs:
    • Generating and transferring new knowledge gained through the accreditation processes
    • Continuous evaluation of existing DAP accreditation programs for relevancy, effectiveness and appropriateness
    • Identifying the need and requirement for new accreditation programs, standards and/or criteria
    • Collecting, analyzing, comparing, and publishing data, and providing feedback on the performance of diagnostic services
    • Resource centre for quality improvement standards, methods and experience, and as a focal point for the collection of local information, as well as for comparisons with other provinces and countries.
  • Monitoring performance of organizations:
    • Selecting and mandating proficiency testing programs;
    • Establishing new proficiency testing programs or approaches to monitoring performance when there is no existing program available;
    • Developing and monitoring robust quality indicators of performance